Mike
Long,
Author and Producer of the
"Everyone Is NOT Doing It"
Abstinence Education Program Statement in Support
of H.R. 4122
And the Continued Funding of Abstinence Education
April 23, 2002
Hearing of the Committee on Energy and Commerce Health Subcommittee
United States House of Representatives
Washington, DC
Michael B. Long
Author, Producer
"Everyone Is NOT Doing It"
Abstinence Education Program
P.O. Box 99487
Raleigh, NC 27624-9487
(919) 562-4080
www.mikelong.com
Mr.
Chairman and Members of the Committee:
My
name is Mike Long and I appreciate the opportunity to submit comments
for the record on Abstinence Education and H.R. 4122. Since 1986,
it has been my privilege to travel to 43 states and train over
23,000 educators how to effectively teach sexual abstinence until
marriage to America's youth. It has truly been rewarding for me
to see these teachers embracing my "directive education" techniques
in teaching abstinence and applying them to their own talent,
professionalism, and love for teenagers in order to be more successful
in the classroom. From a health perspective alone, it is imperative
that teachers, parents, and youth leaders receive all the help
they need to be more successful in teaching sexual abstinence
until marriage to our kids. That is why I support H.R. 4122.
I have seen first hand the tremendous results the Title V abstinence
education funds from the 1996 Welfare Reform Act have had over
the last five years across America. School system after school
system has been able to replace failed comprehensive sex education
programs with solid abstinence education programs that work. Since
1997, we have seen both teen pregnancy rates and abortion rates
steadily decline simultaneously. That is unprecedented in our
nation's history and it is primarily due to the fact that school
systems and youth organizations finally received the funding they
needed to allow them to implement abstinence education programs
for the first time.
It is imperative that this funding continues for the sake of our
teenagers because there is no subject that has generated more
confusion among teens today than sex. Teens say it is all our
friends talk about (peer pressure), it is all we see on television,
it is all we see in movies and advertising, it is all our favorite
groups sing about, and in so many cases our teachers are showing
us how (comprehensive sex education). No wonder so many teens
believe "everyone is doing it" and if they want to be cool and
popular like "everyone else," then they need to be doing it too.
The fact of the matter is everyone is NOT doing it. Teenagers
who buy into this kind of "sexual freedom" promoted so heavily
in our culture are now asking these questions: "Hey man, what
is all this I am hearing about AIDS and STDs? Why are so many
of my friends suffering emotionally from premarital sex? I am
not ready to be a mother. I am not ready to be a father. Is there
anything I can do to be 'sexually free' of these things?" There
is no doubt the sexual revolution of the last few decades has
not only produced the greatest epidemic of sexually transmitted
diseases, teen pregnancy, divorce, and heartache in our society;
but also the most confused and misdirected generation of teenagers
ever in our schools.
The
"Safe Sex" Approach
And
what has been the response of many educators to this epidemic?
"We have got to protect these kids today and the best way to do
that is to teach them how to use condoms and birth control while
allowing them to make their own sexual decisions (comprehensive
sex education)." This response coupled with the false assumption
that "hormone enraged teenagers" are going to be sexually active
anyway has led many educators to what I call a defeatist attitude
in teaching. Such an attitude has caused many teachers to lower
their standards and expectations to the level that teens today
cannot practice sexual abstinence; therefore it is unrealistic
to teach it. Their assumption has been teenagers are going to
be sexually active anyway, therefore we must give them the information
they need to "protect themselves" while offering them little or
no direction to be completely free from serious consequences.
The
Wrong Way to Teach
Imagine
you are a teacher. You have a classroom of teenage students. You
are getting ready to teach them sex education. Your assumption
is most of them are going to be sexually active anyway. Besides,
their hormones are flowing at that age. Therefore, most of them
are unable to control their sexual desires. You want them to be
protected from many very serious consequences. You say a few words
about abstinence. You tell them it is the 100% effective method
of preventing serious consequences. But you do not spend much
time discussing abstinence because you believe that behavior is
unrealistic. Remember your assumption? Hormones are flowing, they
are going to be sexually active anyway, and they need to be protected.
You spend the remainder of your instruction talking about condoms.
You use props to demonstrate the proper use of condoms. You provide
teens with information about other methods of birth control. You
never offer any real direction concerning an expected standard
of behavior because you believe it is up to teens to decide whether
or not they are going to be sexually active. You are teaching
from the vantage point that they will be sexually active.
Now, try to enter the mind of the misdirected teenager sitting
in your classroom. Here is what they are thinking concerning sex:
-
It is all my friends talk about (peer pressure).
-
It is all I see on television.
-
It
is all I see in the movies.
-
It is all I see in commercials and advertising (sex sells).
-
It
is all my favorite groups are singing about.
Then,
consider the number of teens exposed to difficult family situations,
broken homes, drug infested neighborhoods, gangs, etc. No wonder
so many teens believe the following:
-
Everyone is doing it.
- I
have the desire to do it.
- I
want to be cool and popular like everyone else I see doing it
(media exposure).
- In
many cases, my teacher is showing me how (comprehensive sex ed.)
Comprehensive
sex education has asked children to make adult decisions even though
they freely admit they can't decide on their own. In the past this
form of teaching has created an expectation in teenager's minds
that adults do not believe they can practice abstinence because
they are going to do it anyway. Educators have equipped teens with
a false security in knowing that their teacher taught them how to
protect themselves. Alas, the environment of the comprehensive sex
education classroom! No wonder we have had a teenage epidemic of
sex in this country today.
As an abstinence educator and teacher trainer, the one thing I have
learned from teens themselves concerning this non-directional, comprehensive
approach to sex education is: Teens today know more about contraceptives
than at any time in our history and yet most will choose not to
use them for 3 primary reasons: 1) The invincible teenager - the
nothing is going to happen to me mentality. 2) Takes all the romance
out of it. Teens would rather sex happen in the heat of the moment
as opposed to stopping to use a condom, etc. 3) Any teen that chooses
to use contraceptives identifies themselves as being sexually active
and they do not like the identity. So I learned a long time ago,
you can teach teens all you want about contraceptives and most will
choose not to use them anyway. Again, you're asking children to
make adult decisions.
One of the worst experiences I have ever had was talking with a
17 year old boy in Kalamazoo, MI who said to me (pay close attention
to the words he used): "Mr. Long, I thought I was being responsible.
I thought I was being safe. I thought I was being mature. I used
a condom--just like they taught me in school. Why am I a father
now?" What this teenager did not learn was the failure rates involved
with condom use. He followed the instruction of his comprehensive
sex ed. teacher who said the responsible, safe, and mature thing
for him to do was to use a condom. That instruction failed him.
Now he has to deal with the responsibilities of fatherhood at 17
years of age. My question to the comprehensive sex ed. teacher who
offers this kind of instruction is, "What are you going to say to
the teen who takes your advice, uses a condom, and still gets AIDS
or any other STD?"
Another thing I have learned from teens is that many of them do
not realize that their sexual drive is controllable and that changing
their sexual behavior is possible. This does not surprise me due
to of all the pressures they face to remain or become sexually active.
The media portrays teen sex drives as uncontrollable. Couple this
with the lowered standards and expectations of the comprehensive
sex education teacher and you have reduced teenagers to the level
of mere animals regarding sex. But we all know our teens are far
more than that.
Teenagers are not just sexual beings (as comprehensive sex ed. teaches),
they are human beings. That is why abstinence education emphasizes
the mental side of human sexuality. It stresses to teens to use
that smart brain they have and make intelligent decisions before
they act so that if they're not ready to take on unwanted consequences
in their lives, they have the mental power to make decisions beforehand
that will completely free them from those unwanted consequences.
Abstinence education teaches teens the emotional side of human sexuality.
It teaches teens to consider the "heart of the matter." This is
where so many teens are getting hurt from premarital sex when their
heart gets broken when someone gets what they're after, and then
they get "dumped" (which is usually what happens in most teen sexual
relationships). This causes emotional heartache that teens suffer.
Abstinence
education teaches the moral side of human sexuality. It is not for
the teacher to impose his or her religious values in the classroom.
Quite the contrary. It is the teacher's responsibility to get teenagers
to reflect back on what they are learning at home from their parents
or in their respective churches, synagogues, or other religious
institutions. Why? Because this is a very important aspect to human
sexuality that one cannot ignore.
And abstinence education teaches the social side of human sexuality.
Here we are dealing with consequences. We're dealing with respect,
responsibility, maturity, discipline, etc. Aspects of life that
all parents, teachers, principals, and administrators want for their
kids. Unlike comprehensive sex education, abstinence education goes
much further in teaching teens all aspects of human sexuality instead
of focusing mostly on the physical side. And abstinence education
is much more effective because it is "directive" in its implementation
rather than "non-directive." Teens conclude by their teacher's direction
that abstinence is the wisest, most healthy choice for them to make
at this point in their lives. The great thing about this kind of
directive teaching is when it is taught correctly, it works!
For
example, when I was in high school, everyday when I came home from
school, I got this physical urge to eat. I wanted a snack. (A teen
can relate to this!) Every time I felt this physical urge to eat,
I went and immediately satisfied it with an afternoon snack. Every
time I felt this physical urge and my immediate response was to
go ahead and satisfy it, something negative occurred in my life.
Ask any teen what happened and they will tell you I gained weight!
One day I was walking down the halls of my high school and the basketball
coach came up to me and said, "Mike, looks like you are putting
a few pounds on, basketball season is just around the corner, you
better lose some weight." I then made a decision. From now on every
afternoon when I come home from school I would cut out that afternoon
snack. Just because I made that decision does that mean the physical
urge that I feel is going to go away? Of course not. It is probably
going to get stronger. But if I do not go and immediately satisfy
it (out of control), it is not going to kill me. In fact, I learned
ways to re-channel that physical energy in order to experience positives
from it, not negatives. For me, it was to go out and shoot some
basketball. As a result, not only did I lose weight, I became a
better basketball player in the process. Now let us ask teens to
relate this example to their sexual drive.
Abstinence
education taught in a directive way is not designed to force teenagers
to suppress their sexual drive in the back of their head like it
does not exist in order to avoid dangerous consequences. In fact,
abstinence education encourages teens to recognize their sexual
drive, appreciate it, but understand that it is controllable! This
kind of education empowers teens to redirect physical energies in
order to experience positives in their lives, not negatives. It
builds character, discipline, and self-esteem. It offers teens a
way out (renewed virginity) of dangerous activities they may already
be involved in. And it's always amazing to me to hear the number
of teens who have been through an abstinence program inevitably
say, "I never knew my sexual drive was controllable." "I never knew
I could change!" When taught on a teen's level, abstinence education
gets the right results.
Abstinence Education IS Comprehensive In It's Approach
If we want our teens to be safe and healthy in this sex-crazed culture,
it is imperative that teachers be given the training and resources
they need to effectively teach sexual abstinence until marriage
as the standard for America's youth. When taught correctly, everything
teenagers need to make informed decisions about sex are covered.
For example, comprehensive sex ed. advocates like to argue that
teaching "abstinence-only" is simply lecturing kids to "Just say
NO!" That is a major fallacy. Abstinence education taught in a directive
approach enables a teacher to present the issue on a teen's level
so that the teen concludes in his or her mind that abstinence is
the wisest, most healthy choice at this point in their lives. In
fact, the word "abstinence" or "no" is hardly ever used in directive
abstinence education. Again, by the teacher's direction, the teen
concludes hundreds of times that "abstinence is the wisest most
health choice for me to make." That is what makes it work!
Another
fallacy of abstinence education is that it is not comprehensive.
In other words, it completely disregards any instruction on contraceptives.
In fact, quite the contrary is true. Contraceptives are discussed
at great length in abstinence education but the difference is that
they are not presented as "safe sex" because there is no such thing
nor are they presented as a mixed message which is so often the
case in comprehensive sex ed. programs.
Consider Sec. of State Colin Powell's remarks recently on MTV. He
was asked how sexually active teens should respond to the AIDS epidemic.
His response in so many words was to "protect yourself" by using
condoms. Although his advice may have been considered by many to
be well intentioned and reasonable, I didn't provide the real truth
behind the advice he gave. Here's how I would have answered the
question:
Many
have often heard that if you're going to be sexually active, you
should use a condom. Well let me tell you what that condom WILL
do for you. It will reduce your risk of becoming a parent when you're
not ready, but you must understand, the risk is still there. It
will reduce your risk of contracting AIDS and some diseases, but
you must understand, the risk is still there. What kind of odds
do you want to play when it comes to AIDS, genital warts (HPV),
and other diseases that will scar you for life? Response from kids
is always: ZERO! Guess what? Teenagers just concluded that abstinence
was the best choice for them to make. You never even said the word,
yet teens themselves arrived at that conclusion on their own by
simply hearing the truth of what a condom will do. They embrace
abstinence because none of them want to take their chances of contracting
these life scarring diseases no matter how much the odds are reduced.
Oh, and by the way teenagers....I've never seen a condom made anywhere
in the world that will protect a teenager's HEART and this is where
most teens are getting hurt.
Now, in this example, did I talk about condoms? YES I DID! The difference
is, I told the whole truth about them and in doing so, teenagers
are intelligent enough to embrace abstinence as the only answer
to a happier, healthier, and more fulfilling life. Abstinence education
allows teens to learn that if they are going to be sexually active,
contraceptives will reduce the risks of some dangerous consequences,
but teens also learn that the risks are still there. This empowers
teens to conclude that contraceptives are not always "safe," nor
are they the complete answer to the problem. But, unlike what most
comprehensive sex ed. advocates say in that abstinence education
does not teach contraceptives, don't believe it! We do teach them.
We teach the real truth about them. And teens make better decisions
as a result.
One final fallacy of abstinence education is the assumption that
educators are trying to teach religion in the public schools. This
could not be any further from the truth. Abstinence education does
not teach religion, it teaches good health. If good health (abstinence
until marriage) happens to agree with a religious tenant, that is
no reason not to teach good health. There are many public institutions
that use public money to feed the hungry and home the homeless.
Faith, hope, and charity are religious tenants. Does this mean we
stop using public institutions and money to do that--of course not!
Conclusion
As more and more educators and health professionals embrace the
effectiveness of directive teaching as it relates to abstinence
education, they create a greater link between the school and community.
Parents are all for these kinds of programs. In fact, in all the
parent conferences I conduct, the overwhelming response from parents
is, "It is about time!!" Abstinence education empowers parents with
tremendous opportunities to direct their teens at home. So many
parents ask me, "How do I talk with my teens about sex so they will
listen?" That is the beauty of the Community Awareness Program that
many public school abstinence education programs are conducting
now. Parents are trained in an evening session the merits of "directive
parenting." They understand exactly what will be taught in their
teens' classroom and they are given parent manuals so that they
can further the discussion at home. These programs are a beautiful
link between the school and home and they empower parents to contribute
to the education process. I seen very few if any comprehensive sex
ed. programs that involves parents which is very unfortunate.
The real beauty of abstinence education is that it is cost effective.
The Title V abstinence education funds allocated over the past five
years have been a drop in the bucket compared to the amount of money
the federal government has put into failed comprehensive sex education
programs. By expanding Title V in H.R. 4122, more schools systems
that want to implement solid abstinence education programs will
finally have the funds to do so. More teachers will be trained,
more parents will be involved, and more teens will be saved from
life-scarring consequences. Fewer teens having babies means fewer
welfare checks. I believe that Title V is a small investment made
in our nation's youth that reap tremendous dividends across the
board. The past successes of abstinence education programs across
the nation will continue to grow with future investments. It is
crucial that this committee gives abstinence education the necessary
funds to continue protecting America's greatest resource-our youth.
I appreciate the opportunity to submit these comments for the record,
and ask that the Committee members direct any questions to me about
this testimony. Thank you.
Michael B. Long
Author, Producer
"Everyone Is NOT Doing It"
Abstinence Education Program
P.O. Box 61863
Durham, NC 27715-1963
(919) 562-4080
|